On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, David Rientjes wrote:

> The mempolicy mode constants, MPOL_DEFAULT, MPOL_PREFERRED, MPOL_BIND,
> and MPOL_INTERLEAVE, are better declared as part of an enum for type
> checking.
> 
> The policy member of struct mempolicy is also converted from type short
> to type unsigned short.  A negative policy does not have any legitimate
> meaning, so it is possible to change its type in preparation for adding
> optional mode flags later.

The second paragraphs seems to indicate that such an approach does not 
work since we also use MPOL_xx constants to set flags in the memory 
policies?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to