On 7/23/26 12:26, Nguyen Dinh Phi [SG] wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>> Yeah, we need to handle that part better, I think it's a leftover when >>>>> we generalized AF_VSOCK to support more transport than vmci. >>> >>> Speaking of leftovers, I have trouble understanding where does vsock set >>> sk_err on listener sockets anyway. If it doesn't, why vsock_accept() >>> checks for it? >> >> I can't also see where it can be set TBH. Should we remove it ? > > I couldn't find it for listener side too.
Removing sk_err handling from vsock_accept() solves the problem, right? thanks, Michal
