On 7/24/26 16:14, Leon Hwang wrote:
> When CONFIG_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION is disabled, a sleepable tracing prog
> is allowed to attach to '__x64_'-alike prefix symbols.
> 
> It is because the verifier does not verify whether the symbol is a kernel
> function or a bpf prog. That said, a sleepable tracing prog is allowed to
> attach to a bpf prog target whose name has '__x64_'-alike prefix.
> 
> For example, a sleepable fentry prog attaches to a '__x64_sys_nop' XDP
> prog, and copies buffer from a user pointer with bpf_copy_from_user()
> helper. After attaching the XDP prog to lo interface, the kernel BUG
> could be triggered by 'ping -c 1 -W 1 127.0.0.1':
> 
> [    3.460756] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at 
> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c:1324
> 
> Fix it by disallowing sleepable tracing prog always when its target is
> bpf prog.
> 
> Fixes: 16d9c5660692 ("bpf: Always allow sleepable programs on syscalls")
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 52be0a118cce..40d567b90d24 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -18935,13 +18935,16 @@ static bool is_tracing_multi_id(const struct 
> bpf_prog *prog, u32 btf_id)
>  }
>  
>  static int btf_id_allow_sleepable(u32 btf_id, unsigned long addr, const 
> struct bpf_prog *prog,
> -                               const struct btf *btf)
> +                               const struct btf *btf, const struct bpf_prog 
> *tgt_prog)
>  {
>       const struct btf_type *t;
>       const char *tname;
>  
>       switch (prog->type) {
>       case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
> +             if (tgt_prog)
> +                     return prog->sleepable ? -EINVAL : 0;

The prog->sleepable check is redundant since btf_id_allow_sleepable() is
only called if prog->sleepable is true.

Other than that:

Acked-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]>

> +
>               t = btf_type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
>               if (!t)
>                       return -EINVAL;
> @@ -19324,7 +19327,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log 
> *log,
>               }
>  
>               if (prog->sleepable) {
> -                     ret = btf_id_allow_sleepable(btf_id, addr, prog, btf);
> +                     ret = btf_id_allow_sleepable(btf_id, addr, prog, btf, 
> tgt_prog);
>                       if (ret) {
>                               module_put(mod);
>                               bpf_log(log, "%s is not sleepable\n", tname);
> @@ -19575,7 +19578,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_btf_id_multi(struct btf *btf, 
> struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 bt
>  
>       /* Check sleepable program attachment. */
>       if (prog->sleepable) {
> -             err = btf_id_allow_sleepable(btf_id, addr, prog, btf);
> +             err = btf_id_allow_sleepable(btf_id, addr, prog, btf, NULL);
>               if (err)
>                       return err;
>       }


Reply via email to