On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008 21:04:06 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> >
> > And you just copied the real bug in that logic as well:
> >
> > set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, size);
>
> Oops you're right. I wanted to fix that, but didn't. Ok I'll put up
> my brown paper back tonight when I go out.
>
> > ------------------------^^^^^^^^
> >
> > which is initialized a couple of lines down.
> >
> > md->virt_addr = (u64) (unsigned long) va;
> >
> > The reordering/optimizing needs to be a separate patch.
>
> What optimizing? It wasn't intended to be an optimization.
> It fixes a bug.
No, it does not. Please go back and read my mail.
The code had exactly two bugs:
1) the logic of checking EFI_MEMORY_WB was wrong
2) the uninitialized variable
The fix is:
arch/x86/kernel/efi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/efi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/efi.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/efi.c
@@ -428,9 +428,6 @@ void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
else
va = efi_ioremap(md->phys_addr, size);
- if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB)
- set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, size);
-
md->virt_addr = (u64) (unsigned long) va;
if (!va) {
@@ -439,6 +436,9 @@ void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
continue;
}
+ if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB))
+ set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, size);
+
systab = (u64) (unsigned long) efi_phys.systab;
if (md->phys_addr <= systab && systab < end) {
systab += md->virt_addr - md->phys_addr;
The reordering of code is completely irrelevant. It can be done, but
in a separate patch.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
