On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:50:45 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +/**
> + * hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu - iterate over rcu hlist after current
> point
> + * @tpos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
> + * @pos: the &struct hlist_node to use as a loop cursor.
> + * @member: the name of the hlist_node within the struct.
> + */
> +#define hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(tpos, pos, member) \
> + for (pos = (pos)->next; \
> + rcu_dereference(pos) && ({ prefetch(pos->next); 1;}) && \
> + ({ tpos = hlist_entry(pos, typeof(*tpos), member); 1;}); \
> + pos = pos->next)
Is the compiler allowed to look at a term such as
({ prefetch(pos->next); 1;})
and, when it is used as a truth value, say "hey, that's always true" and
then elide the call to prefetch()? We've no way of telling because this
remains gcc-specific territory, afaik.
(cc Paul for rcu stuff)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
