Add L3_CBM_VALIDATE to verify that resctrl enforces the L3 CBM rules
advertised by cbm_mask and min_cbm_bits.

Confirm that the full mask is accepted. Check the empty mask according
to min_cbm_bits, and confirm that out-of-range and undersized masks are
rejected.

This catches inconsistencies between the advertised capabilities and
schemata validation.

Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <[email protected]>
---
Changelog:

v1 -> v2:
    - Rename L3_CAT_VALIDATE to L3_CBM_VALIDATE
    - Handle empty CBMs according to min_cbm_bits
    - Check count_contiguous_bits() before using its result
    - Use KSFT_FAIL and reverse-fir-tree ordering
    - Use a 64-bit out-of-range mask

Best regards,
Richard Cheng.
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c    | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h     |  1 +
 .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c |  1 +
 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
index 371a2f26dc47..a06c57954740 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
@@ -357,6 +357,89 @@ static bool noncont_cat_feature_check(const struct 
resctrl_test *test)
        return resource_info_file_exists(test->resource, "sparse_masks");
 }
 
+/*
+ * L3_CBM_VALIDATE - Verify L3 CBM write validation.
+ *
+ * A full CBM must be accepted. An empty CBM is valid only when min_cbm_bits
+ * is zero. Masks with bits outside cbm_mask or fewer than min_cbm_bits must
+ * be rejected.
+ */
+static int cbm_validate_run_test(const struct resctrl_test *test,
+                                const struct user_params *uparams)
+{
+       unsigned int min_cbm_bits, contiguous_bits;
+       unsigned long long invalid_mask;
+       unsigned int count_of_bits;
+       unsigned long full_mask;
+       unsigned int start;
+       char schemata[64];
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = get_full_cbm(test->resource, &full_mask);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       ret = resource_info_unsigned_get(test->resource, "min_cbm_bits",
+                                        &min_cbm_bits);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       count_of_bits = count_bits(full_mask);
+
+       /* A valid full CBM must be accepted. */
+       snprintf(schemata, sizeof(schemata), "%lx", full_mask);
+       if (write_schemata("", schemata, uparams->cpu, test->resource)) {
+               ksft_print_msg("Valid CBM 0x%lx was rejected\n", full_mask);
+               return KSFT_FAIL;
+       }
+
+       ret = write_schemata("", "0", uparams->cpu, test->resource);
+       if (min_cbm_bits && !ret) {
+               ksft_print_msg("Empty CBM was accepted, must be rejected\n");
+               return KSFT_FAIL;
+       }
+       if (!min_cbm_bits && ret) {
+               ksft_print_msg("Empty CBM was rejected, must be accepted\n");
+               return KSFT_FAIL;
+       }
+
+       /* A mask with a bit outside cbm_mask must be rejected. */
+       invalid_mask = (unsigned long long)full_mask | (1ULL << count_of_bits);
+       snprintf(schemata, sizeof(schemata), "%llx", invalid_mask);
+       if (!write_schemata("", schemata, uparams->cpu, test->resource)) {
+               ksft_print_msg("Out-of-range CBM 0x%llx was accepted, must be 
rejected\n",
+                              invalid_mask);
+               return KSFT_FAIL;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * When min_cbm_bits is greater than one, a non-empty mask with fewer
+        * bits must be rejected.
+        */
+       if (min_cbm_bits > 1) {
+               contiguous_bits = count_contiguous_bits(full_mask, &start);
+               if (contiguous_bits < min_cbm_bits) {
+                       ksft_print_msg("Full CBM has %u contiguous bits, fewer 
than "
+                                      "min_cbm_bits=%u\n",
+                                      contiguous_bits, min_cbm_bits);
+                       return KSFT_FAIL;
+               }
+
+               invalid_mask = create_bit_mask(start, min_cbm_bits - 1);
+               snprintf(schemata, sizeof(schemata), "%llx", invalid_mask);
+               if (!write_schemata("", schemata, uparams->cpu,
+                                   test->resource)) {
+                       ksft_print_msg("CBM 0x%llx with too few bits was 
accepted\n",
+                                      invalid_mask);
+                       return KSFT_FAIL;
+               }
+       }
+
+       ksft_print_msg("Pass: L3 CBM writes were validated correctly\n");
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
 struct resctrl_test l3_cat_test = {
        .name = "L3_CAT",
        .group = "CAT",
@@ -366,6 +449,14 @@ struct resctrl_test l3_cat_test = {
        .cleanup = cat_test_cleanup,
 };
 
+struct resctrl_test l3_cbm_validate_test = {
+       .name = "L3_CBM_VALIDATE",
+       .group = "CAT",
+       .resource = "L3",
+       .feature_check = test_resource_feature_check,
+       .run_test = cbm_validate_run_test,
+};
+
 struct resctrl_test l3_noncont_cat_test = {
        .name = "L3_NONCONT_CAT",
        .group = "CAT",
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h 
b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
index 175101022bf3..a6fc688ed997 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ extern struct resctrl_test mbm_test;
 extern struct resctrl_test mba_test;
 extern struct resctrl_test cmt_test;
 extern struct resctrl_test l3_cat_test;
+extern struct resctrl_test l3_cbm_validate_test;
 extern struct resctrl_test l3_noncont_cat_test;
 extern struct resctrl_test l2_noncont_cat_test;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
index dbcd5eea9fbc..57a4d0815b67 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ static struct resctrl_test *resctrl_tests[] = {
        &mba_test,
        &cmt_test,
        &l3_cat_test,
+       &l3_cbm_validate_test,
        &l3_noncont_cat_test,
        &l2_noncont_cat_test,
 };
-- 
2.53.0


Reply via email to