On Tue, Aug 18 2026, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 4:11 PM Luis Henriques <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I'm (finally!) sending v2 of this patchset. It tries to document (and add >> a few kselftests) to the different types of caches that are currently in use >> within FUSE. As I mentioned in v1 the idea for documenting this came from >> Miklos during this year's LSFMM, where he mentioned he would like to see >> caches usage documented before he could merge an initial version of fusex. >> >> This version documents symlinks, attributes, ACLs and readdir caches. Still >> missing: dentries and data caching. >> >> I'm still sending it as an RFC as I'm still not sure if it fulfils Miklos' >> initial goal. >> >> As usual feedback is welcome, as I'll (slowly) continue looking into other >> cache types. >> >> Major changes since v1: >> - Added more caches to the document >> - Changed tests format to single self-contained binaries >> - Since Amir added a new fuse3-based test, the conversion to fuse3 of the >> fusectl has minor changes to the Makefile >> - NOTE: I've kept Amir's Reviewed-by anyway (should I drop it?) > > It's fine. I trust your judgement. > > Please see Sashiko review comments.
Sure, I will do that. (For some reason I assumed I would receive an email if there was a review for my patches. Looks like that's not the case.) > My main concern is with the doc - it's not an easy read > and I would have liked it to be and I found many correctness error > which is not a good sign. Hmm... OK, I'll need to go through those errors and try my best to see if I can fix them. Thanks a lot for your feedback, Amir. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Luís
