On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 03:28:39PM +0100, Leonardo Bras wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 03:07:14PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I think what would help here would be to move to generating more of the > > save/restore sequences rather than open coding them, we could have lists > > of registers and then use data about the feature dependencies that the > > architecture has (hopefully it's already in the MRS, I didn't check) to > > generate these optimised feature checks rather than having to open code > > them. Possibly even list features and generate some of the register > > lists, though that would need far more special case handling and it's > > *much* less clear if there could be a benefit. > Yeah, that would automatize the feature dependency for register loading, > but maybe code would not be that clear on how it works? I have questionable > taste, though. I was thinking of generating as part of the build process rather than as a one off so you'd not actually look at the code in the normal course of affairs.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
