Le Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:29:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> no strong feelings if the ACPI guys ack it - but i suspect the > renaming of the function from acpi_parse_sbf to sbf_acpi_parse was > unnecessary? I rename acpi_parse_sbf() to sbf_acpi_parse() because the function was moved from arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c, where pretty much all functions are named acpi_*() to the file arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c, where all the functions are named sbf_*(). However, I don't mind reverting that renaming, I just thought it was cleaner, but I have no strong opinion on it. Any thoughts about the duplicate call to acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BOOT, acpi_parse_sbf) ? Thanks for your comments, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Free Embedded Linux Training Materials on http://free-electrons.com/training (More than 1500 pages!)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature