On 03/09/2026 20:25, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2026, Matthew Sakai wrote:I had to look at this for quite a while to figure out what was going on. We made the same spelling error twice in the same function and somehow only noticed the first one previously? Anyway, Reviewed-by: Matthew Sakai <[email protected]> On 9/3/26 11:23 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:There is another spelling mistake in a vdo_log_error message that I somehow overlooked last time. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> --- drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c index 1d8375cc3c3e..043549b1fc2e 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int __must_check parse_slab_size(const char *slab_str, block_count_t *sla result = kstrtoull(slab_str, 10, &value); if (result) { - vdo_log_error("optional parameter error: invalid slab size, must be a postive integer"); + vdo_log_error("optional parameter error: invalid slab size, must be a positive integer"); return -EINVAL; }My rule from years back was ... you find one typo, you "grep -rw" the entire kernel tree.
Yup, normally do, somehow this slipped through :-(
rday
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
