The comment reads "This code assumes that is is run from EL2". The first "is" is not a repetition, it should be "it".
v1 deleted the second "is" instead, which left the sentence without a subject. Fuad Tabba pointed out the correct reading. Only touches a comment, no code changes. Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5 Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <[email protected]> --- arch/arm64/kvm/pauth.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pauth.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pauth.c index d5eb3ae876be..bb6c42e78058 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pauth.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pauth.c @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ * * Primitive PAuth emulation for ERETAA/ERETAB. * - * This code assumes that is is run from EL2, and that it is part of + * This code assumes that it is run from EL2, and that it is part of * the emulation of ERETAx for a guest hypervisor. That's a lot of * baked-in assumptions and shortcuts. *
