On Tue, 2026-09-08 at 15:53 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Thank you very much!!! > > I am interpreting this to mean that Kunwu's current approach does what > you need, so that we can keep current get_state_synchronize_srcu() > and poll_state_synchronize_srcu() semantics.
Yes, thank you. I'll rebase the KVM parts on top when it lands.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
