On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 05:20:33AM +0000, Chaithanya Lagisetty wrote:
> uffd_setup_demand_paging() passes the element size as the first argument
> to calloc() and the element count as the second:
> 
>       uffd_desc->pipefds = calloc(sizeof(int), num_readers);
> 
> calloc() expects the number of elements first and the size of each element
> second. The product, and therefore the allocation size, is the same either
> way, so this is not a functional change, but the arguments are misleading
> and GCC 14 diagnoses them with -Wcalloc-transposed-args, which is enabled
> by -Wextra.
> 
> Swap the arguments to match the calloc() prototype.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaithanya Lagisetty <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
> index f7ce5a6ddcc2..49eff05b7d39 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/userfaultfd_util.c
> @@ -119,13 +119,13 @@ struct uffd_desc *uffd_setup_demand_paging(int 
> uffd_mode, useconds_t delay,
>       uffd_desc = malloc(sizeof(struct uffd_desc));
>       TEST_ASSERT(uffd_desc, "Failed to malloc uffd descriptor");
>  
> -     uffd_desc->pipefds = calloc(sizeof(int), num_readers);
> +     uffd_desc->pipefds = calloc(num_readers, sizeof(int));
>       TEST_ASSERT(uffd_desc->pipefds, "Failed to alloc pipes");
>  
> -     uffd_desc->readers = calloc(sizeof(pthread_t), num_readers);
> +     uffd_desc->readers = calloc(num_readers, sizeof(pthread_t));
>       TEST_ASSERT(uffd_desc->readers, "Failed to alloc reader threads");
>  
> -     uffd_desc->reader_args = calloc(sizeof(struct uffd_reader_args), 
> num_readers);
> +     uffd_desc->reader_args = calloc(num_readers, sizeof(struct 
> uffd_reader_args));
>       TEST_ASSERT(uffd_desc->reader_args, "Failed to alloc reader_args");
>  
>       uffd_desc->num_readers = num_readers;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Good catch
Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <[email protected]>

Reply via email to