On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 08:36:37PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > qcom,hawi-cdsp-pas was initially grouped as a fallback to > qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas on the assumption of hardware-level compatibility. > Bringup revealed that the NSP proxy power domain on Hawi requires a > specific RPMH performance level that the sm8550 driver data does not > provide, breaking the compatibility contract the fallback string implies. > Maili CDSP shares the same NSP power domain topology as Hawi and must > fall back to qcom,hawi-cdsp-pas rather than qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas to > inherit the correct cx/mxc/nsp power-domain constraint. > > Remove qcom,hawi-cdsp-pas from the sm8550-cdsp-pas fallback items block, > add it to the standalone compatible enum, and extend the existing > cx/mxc/nsp power-domain constraint to cover it explicitly. Move > qcom,maili-cdsp-pas from the sm8550-cdsp-pas fallback to a new > hawi-cdsp-pas fallback items block; it is covered by the hawi > cx/mxc/nsp constraint implicitly via the contains check. > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]> - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
