On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 07:44:30AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Jarkko, > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 04:05:22AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 04:01:57AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > I pushed this to for-next-tpm, which mirrors to linux-next. > > I don't spot it in > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git > for-next-tpm > > , do I look at the wrong tree? > > > > However, since this is -next only bug, I guess I should squash these to > > > the original commit? > > > > > > Just sanity checking before taking action :-) > > > > My suggestion would be to amend Co-authored-by to the original commit > > message as two bug fixes is significant amount of effort to make the > > change right. > > I don't care much about my Tested-by: tag, so feel free to drop it. > Promoting that to a Tested-by: on the squashed commit is wrong for sure. > > Best regards > Uwe
Sorry I had my tree in bad state as per syncing with remotes. I now squashed fix to the original commit from Li. Br, Jarkko
