On 9/30/2026 10:17 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 08:58:46AM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> Fix following sparse warnings by using __force attribute:
>>
>> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:571:20: sparse: sparse:
>> cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:749:17: sparse: sparse:
>> cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:773:24: sparse: sparse:
>> cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:797:25: sparse: sparse:
>> cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
>>
>>>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: sparse:
>> incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected
>> void *rsc_offset @@ got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse:
>> expected void *rsc_offset
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: got
>> void [noderef] __iomem *
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>> Closes:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]>
>
> I have applied this patch - apoligies for the delay, it got lost in the heap.
>
Thank You, no problem.
Tanmay
> Mathieu
>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> index c685bb5fa62c..f9cdd3c024dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> /* Update memory entry va */
>> - mem->va = (void *)va;
>> + mem->va = (__force void *)va;
>>
>> /* clear TCMs */
>> memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
>> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static struct resource_table
>> *zynqmp_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc
>>
>> *size = r5_core->rsc_tbl_size;
>>
>> - return (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
>> + return (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
>> }
>>
>> static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct
>> zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - rsc_data_va = (struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start,
>> + rsc_data_va = (__force struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start,
>> sizeof(struct
>> rsc_tbl_data));
>> if (!rsc_data_va) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to map resource table data address\n");
>> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct
>> zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - rsc_tbl_addr = (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
>> + rsc_tbl_addr = (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va;
>>
>> /*
>> * As of now resource table version 1 is expected. Don't fail to attach
>> @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_handle_rsc(struct rproc *rproc, u32
>> rsc_type, void *rsc,
>> int offset, int avail)
>> {
>> struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> - void *rsc_offset = (r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset);
>> + void *rsc_offset = (__force void *)(r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset);
>>
>> if (rsc_type != XLNX_RPROC_FW_CRASH_REPORT)
>> return RSC_IGNORED;
>>
>> base-commit: d4d61a4b0a52e8f3cdb3e1578602850a3452ec3e
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
