On 3 October 2026 17:17:19 BST, Kunwu Chan <[email protected]> wrote:
>Add support for scaling atomic SRCU grace periods using
>srcu_read_lock_atomic()/srcu_read_unlock_atomic() and
>synchronize_srcu_atomic().
>
>Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
>Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <[email protected]>

1: why didn't u cc me
2: why did you ommit my tag? I tend to review based on correctness, cuz idk 
pauls preferences, once I do I'll be a better rcu reviewer.

>---
>Changes since v1:
>- Rename srcu_atomic_ctlp to srcua and reuse srcu_ctlp for
>  SRCU operations, as suggested by Paul.
>- Reuse the existing SRCU cleanup and completed helpers by
>  initializing srcu_ctlp in srcu_atomic_scale_init().
>- Add .stats using srcu_scale_stats().
>- Use "srcua" to match the existing "srcu" and "srcud" scale
>  type names.
>- Use synchronize_srcu_atomic() for both normal and expedited
>  scale tests.
>
>v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>Tested with kvm.sh --torture rcuscale scale_type=srcua on x86_64 and
>arm64, alongside gp_exp=1 and PROVE_LOCKING=y: no warnings or lockdep
>splats.
>---
> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
>index 1097ec15879c..b172882824ac 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
>@@ -293,6 +293,44 @@ static struct rcu_scale_ops srcud_ops = {
>       .name           = "srcud"
> };
> 
>+static struct srcu_struct srcua;
>+
>+static int srcu_scale_atomic_read_lock(void)
>+{
>+      return srcu_read_lock_atomic(srcu_ctlp);
>+}
>+
>+static void srcu_scale_atomic_read_unlock(int idx)
>+{
>+      srcu_read_unlock_atomic(srcu_ctlp, idx);
>+}
>+
>+static void srcu_scale_atomic_synchronize(void)
>+{
>+      synchronize_srcu_atomic(srcu_ctlp);
>+}
>+
>+static void srcu_atomic_scale_init(void)
>+{
>+      srcu_ctlp = &srcua;
>+      init_srcu_struct_atomic(srcu_ctlp);
>+}
>+
>+static struct rcu_scale_ops srcua_ops = {
>+      .ptype          = SRCU_FLAVOR,
>+      .init           = srcu_atomic_scale_init,
>+      .cleanup        = srcu_sync_scale_cleanup,
>+      .readlock       = srcu_scale_atomic_read_lock,
>+      .readunlock     = srcu_scale_atomic_read_unlock,
>+      .get_gp_seq     = srcu_scale_completed,
>+      .gp_diff        = rcu_seq_diff,
>+      .exp_completed  = srcu_scale_completed,
>+      .sync           = srcu_scale_atomic_synchronize,
>+      .exp_sync       = srcu_scale_atomic_synchronize,
>+      .stats          = srcu_scale_stats,
>+      .name           = "srcua"
>+};
>+
> #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> 
> /*
>@@ -1110,7 +1148,8 @@ rcu_scale_init(void)
>       long i;
>       long j;
>       static struct rcu_scale_ops *scale_ops[] = {
>-              &rcu_ops, &srcu_ops, &srcud_ops, TASKS_OPS TASKS_RUDE_OPS 
>TASKS_TRACING_OPS
>+              &rcu_ops, &srcu_ops, &srcua_ops, &srcud_ops,
>+              TASKS_OPS TASKS_RUDE_OPS TASKS_TRACING_OPS
>       };
> 
>       if (!torture_init_begin(scale_type, verbose))
>
>base-commit: d21906b0aa1e9573cdb5e7acaca44966b9d1dcd2
>

--- Thanks!
"I'm not a very positive person" - Linus torvalds

Reply via email to