On Feb 14 2008 10:06, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:43:58PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 10 2008 15:33, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
>> >Checkpatch in current mainline outputs following errors:
>> >
>> >$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -q --file ./fs/udf/misc.c
>> >ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
>> >#205: FILE: fs/udf/misc.c:205:
>> >+ tag *tag_p;
>> > ^
>>
>> I'd say "don't add any new typedefs" (and perhaps get rid of old ones).
>
>It should be doing that at the site of the new typedef :)
>
Additionally, yes.
Given:
typedef struct {
...
} tag_t;
void foo(void)
{
tag_t name;
}
A user adding
+ tag_t newthing;
could at the same time give the struct a name if it already does not
have one and instead use
+ struct tag newthing;
then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
