On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 11:23:53PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 02:29:08PM -0500, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 03:12:43PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 01:59:33PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> > > > Ignoring is the only workable long-term solution. > > > How do you decide which patches to ignore ? > > Anything that looks schloppy. ATM it's very easy to tell. > I think we're going about this the wrong way. What we want is high > quality contributions. If they are high quality, who cares if they > are AI-generated or not? I think when people are talking about slop there's always an implicit quality gate in there, what people are talking about is questionable contributions that have an aura of AI assistance about them. It's a specific term for a specific kind of problematic contribution.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
