On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote: > > > > - is this UDP or TCP based? (UDP i guess) > > > > > TCP > > well then i'd suggest to do: > > echo 100000 100000 100000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem > > does this make any difference? According to my notes, i dont see this. however, 262144 into /proc/sys/net/core/*mem_max/default. I have access to my h/ware this weekend. Hopefully i should get something better than ttcp to use. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN... Ion Badulescu
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do wit... Andrew Morton
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do wit... jamal
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do... Ion Badulescu
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing t... jamal
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothi... Ion Badulescu
- Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zeroco... jamal
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... Ingo Molnar
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... jamal
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... Ingo Molnar
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... jamal
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... Malcolm Beattie
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... Ingo Molnar
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... Rick Jones
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... jamal
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... Rick Jones
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... jamal
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... David S. Miller
- Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfil... Rick Jones
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN... jamal
- Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do wit... Andrew Morton