On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:
> So that last line should be:
>
> > 1,3,5 4-10 5,7,9
>
What about this case where one of the relative nodes wraps around to
represent an already set node in the result?
relative mems_allowed result
1,3,6 4-8 5,7 or 5-7 ?
Neither result is immediately obvious to me logically: either your result
has less weight than your relative nodemask (seems like a bad thing) or
your relative nodemask really isn't all that relative to begin with (it's
the same result as 1-3, 6-8, 11-13, etc).
Or is this just a less-than-desired side-effect of relative nodemasks that
we're willing to live with given its other advantages?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
