> > So, no reason for a firewall author to check these bits. > > I thought that most firewalls were supposed to be insanely paranoid. > Perhaps it would be considered a possible covert data channel, as > farfecthed as that may sound. If you care about such things you run pure proxy. A packet filter is a simple access barrier it isnt designed to stop information leakage - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Helge Hafting
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Rick Jones
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Rusty Russell
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Alan Cox
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... David Wagner
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Brian May
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Frank v Waveren
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Frank v Waveren
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Gregory Maxwell
- RE: hotmail not dealing with EC... David Schwartz
- RE: hotmail not dealing with EC... James Sutherland
- Re: hotmail not dealing with EC... Gregory Maxwell