Hi,
On Sunday 17 February 2008, Andrew Smith wrote:
> One Line : Changes in 2.24 have rendered the ide handling on the Via
> NanoBook unstable resulting in data loss under heavy load.
>
> Keywords : modules, pata_via, viac82xxxx
>
> Kernel version : 2.24
>
> Environment : Packard Bell Easynote XS - based on Via Nanobook
> reference platform. (same as Everex Cloudbook in the USA).
>
> Detail:
>
> In v2.23 Kernel the following patch could be applied to viac82xxxx
> (see end of document), this works stably.
>
> In 2.24 the device ID 0x581 for Vendor VIA was added to the pata_via
> driver causing some problems.
>
> It builds fine and seems to start up OK, however, on large IOs then
> the kernel starts to throw errors about MULTICMDs (I think that was
> the term) returning an invalid response.
>
> I have lost 2 builds so far (disk corruption) and have reverted to
> 2.23 with the attached patch which does work fine (and gives UDMA133).
>
> Suggestions:
>
> Re-implement 0x581 handling in via82xxxx based on patch shown below.
Thank you for reporting it (I was unaware that via82cxxx misses some ids).
I ported your patch over 2.6.25-rc2 and merged it.
> Drop 0x581 support from pata_ide unless it is known to work with other
> hardware variants reliably.
Added Jeff/Alan to cc: so they can follow up on this.
> If 0x581 is more desirable in pata_ide then make the via82cxxxx and
> pata_ide drivers mutually exclusive in a kernel configuration.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Andy Smith
>
> *** linux-2.6.23/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c 2007-10-09
> 22:31:38.000000000 +0200
> --- linux-2.6.23-via-patch/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c 2007-11-02
> 01:03:57.000000000 +0100
> ***************
> *** 61,66 ****
> --- 61,68 ----
> #define VIA_NO_UNMASK 0x08 /* Doesn't work with IRQ unmasking
> on */
> #define VIA_BAD_ID 0x10 /* Has wrong vendor ID (0x1107) */
> #define VIA_BAD_AST 0x20 /* Don't touch Address Setup
> Timing */
> + #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700 0x8324
> + #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700_IDE 0x0581
>
> /*
> * VIA SouthBridge chips.
> ***************
> *** 545,550 ****
> --- 547,553 ----
> { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C576_1, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
> { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
> { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1},
> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700_IDE, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
> { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_SATA_EIDE, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1},
> { 0, },
> };
2.6.25-rc2 version:
From: Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] via82cxxx: add new PCI id for cx700
[bart: manually ported it over via82cxxx changes]
From: Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c | 1 +
include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: b/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c
@@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ static int __devinit via_init_one(struct
static const struct pci_device_id via_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C576_1), 0 },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1), 0 },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700_IDE), 0 },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410), 1 },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_SATA_EIDE), 1 },
{ 0, },
Index: b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
===================================================================
--- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
@@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8231_4 0x8235
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8365_1 0x8305
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700 0x8324
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700_IDE 0x0581
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800 0x8353
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8371_1 0x8391
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C598_1 0x8598
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
