On Tuesday 19 February 2008 05:59:21 Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> Does this thread [1] provide any clues as to the Right Thing (TM) to do?
> 
> It should be noted that Linus and Andrew signed off on the m68k fix
> [2]. I'm CC'ing them and Al Viro on this email to solicit their input.
> 
> Gordon
> 
> [1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/801528
> [2] 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7492d4a416d68ab4bd254b36ffcc4e0138daa8ff
> 

That doesn't cause me to magically sign off this sort of patches, too.
The sanity check is clearly broken in file2alias.c, as it checks something
from the target kernel against the host environment it is compiled on.
That doesn't make any sense at all.

I also don't see why we want to compare the size of the struct in kernel
and userland. It is not used in userland.

So NACK for this SSB patch.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to