KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:45:13 +0530 > Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> But for computers, limits is an expected and understood term, and for >>> filesystems it's quotas. So in this case, I *still* think you should >>> be using the term "Memory Quota Controller" instead. It just makes it >>> clearer to a larger audience what you mean. >>> >> Memory Quota sounds very confusing to me. Usually a quota implies limits, >> but in >> a true framework, one can also implement guarantees and shares. >> > This "cgroup memory contoller" is called as "Memory Resource Contoller" > in my office ;) > > How about Memory Resouce Contoller ?
That is a good name and believe me or not I was thinking of the same name. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/