Andrew Vasquez wrote:
<snip>
> > > Hmm, guess it's the earlier 'if (scsi_status == 0)' check 
> a few lines
> > > up...  Dave S., can you take a look at this...  Thanks, av
> > 
> > Ah, so the !scsi_status is wrong it was supposed to be 
> scsi_status !=
> > 0 ... and even then it can just be dropped.
> 
> My guess is that the check should have been written as:
> 
>       ...
>       if (sts_entry->iscsiFlags &ISCSI_FLAG_RESIDUAL_UNDER)
>               scsi_set_resid(cmd, residual);
>               if ((scsi_bufflen(cmd) - residual) < cmd->underflow) {
>                       ...
> 
> It looks to be a logic-error while porting from qla2xxx, where
> scsi_status during CS_COMPLETE is the full 16-bit status (high-byte is
> transport, low-byte SCSI status) from from the FCP_RSP frame (not so
> in iSCSI, where it's just the SCSI-status) and the residual check
> in qla_isr.c::qla2x00_status_entry() looks like:
> 
>       if (!lscsi_status &&
>           ((unsigned)(scsi_bufflen(cp) - resid) <
>            cp->underflow)) {
>               ...
> 
> I'll defer to Dave S. for verification.
> 
The correct patch needs to be 

Signed-off-by: David C Somayajulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_isr.c
b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_isr.c
index 0f029d0..fc84db4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_isr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_isr.c
@@ -100,8 +100,7 @@ static void qla4xxx_status_entry(struct
 
                if (sts_entry->iscsiFlags &ISCSI_FLAG_RESIDUAL_UNDER) {
                        scsi_set_resid(cmd, residual);
-                       if (!scsi_status && ((scsi_bufflen(cmd) -
residual) <
-                               cmd->underflow)) {
+                       if ((scsi_bufflen(cmd) - residual) <
cmd->underflow) {
 
                                cmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to