On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Huang, Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > -int __initdata early_ioremap_debug; > > > > +int __initbss early_ioremap_debug; > > > > > > will we get some sort of build error if we accidentally do: > > > > > > int __initbss early_ioremap_debug = 1; > > > > > > ? > > > > I tested it just now, and there is no build error. > > well, that's bad. We'd silently ignore the " = 1" and boot up with that > value at 0, right? At minimum we need some really prominent build-time > _errors_ (i.e. aborted builds) if this ever happens. But ideally, > shouldnt this whole thing be done at link time? Couldnt the linker sort > the variables that are zero initialized into the right section, and move > this constant maintenance pressure off the programmer's shoulder?
I'm not sure if it's possible currently. But it might be possible to instead tag objects as "init" with an attribute other than section and then move such objects into init sections "by hand" late in the build. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
