21/02/08 20:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote/a écrit: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 08:02:36PM +0100, Eric Piel wrote: >> It's been a week and no one has screamed, so I guess the idea looks fine >> to everyone :-) >> >> Here is a boot tested patch for integration. In addition to the previous >> version, it removes also rootfs_initcall(), and uses fs_initcall_sync(). >> There should be absolutely no difference in behaviour as there was no >> user of fs_initcall_sync() in the kernel. >> >> I'm not sure what should be the best tree to go through. Maybe the ACPI >> tree, as all this is needed for CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD... > > Actually I've just got a report today where we get an uninitialized > spinlock due to this in -mm. It's probably possible to work around it, > though. What do you mean by "due to this"? Due to userspace helper being called too early? Then this patch should fix the bug.
Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/