On 31 Jan 2001, Rupa Schomaker wrote: > But now it doesn't matter. The drive was tainted (fdisk run while > attached to the mainboard controller) and now that geometry is > "stuck". <shrug> I was mostly explaining why it is nice to get the > same geometry on two identical drives (RAID1 is easier for the human > to deal with). It doesn't but I got out of the geometry business two+ years ago... Andries (Mr. FDisk) Brouwer is the man...... Cheers, Andre Hedrick Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under 2.4.... Paul Flinders
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under ... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller un... Matthias Andree
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controlle... Paul Flinders
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controlle... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under 2.4.1 Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under 2.4.... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under ... Rupa Schomaker
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller un... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controlle... Rupa Schomaker
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE cont... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller un... Mark Lord
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controlle... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE cont... Dan Hollis
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE ... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller un... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under 2.4.1 Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Problems with Promise IDE controller under 2.4.1 Andries . Brouwer