Hi,
Gather this is with no swap space allocated... And the question is why does
the oom handler not get triggered?
Ed Tomlinson
David Ford wrote:
> (Chris, changing JOURNAL_MAX_BATCH from 900 to 100 didn't affect
> anything).
>
> Ok, having approached this slightly more intelligently here are [better]
> results.
>
> The dumps are large so they are located at http://stuph.org/VM/. Here's
> the story. I boot and startx, I load xmms and netscape to eat away
> memory. When free buffers/cache falls below 7M the system stalls and
> the only recovery is sysrq-E or reboot. At the moment of stall the disk
> will grind continuously for about 25 to 30 minutes then go silent. At
> this point in time the only recovery is reboot, sysrq-E won't work.
>
> If I move the mouse or type a key within 30 seconds of this incident,
> that user input will take about 5 minutes to register. After that
> initial minute, nothing more will happen.
>
> Kernel 2.4.1, with reiserfs, devfs, no patches applied.
>
> "klog-X" are basically the same thing but I'm running top, syslogd, and
> klogd with -20 priority. I didn't note anything out of the ordinary in
> top. These are snapshots where I've managed to murder processes and
> restart the problem without rebooting.
>
> In the second instance, I had my finger on the kill button and managed
> to kill netscape and recover partially. However the system was heavily
> loaded even after the kill.
>
> I have xmms in STOPped state so it's just waiting.
>
> kswapd is taking 12.2% of the CPU according to ps, and kapm-idled is
> taking 26.9%. bdflush is taking 2.7%, X 3.5%, all others are nominal.
> The system load was hovering at 1.00 for a few minutes then dropped to
> zero. However scrolling text in an rxvt is slow enough to watch blocks
> move. Running "ps aux" takes nearly one third of a second for total
> time. Total number of processes is ~40.
>
> Jan 31 22:31:51 nifty kernel: kapm-idled S CBF77F94 4124 3
> 1 (L-TLB) 4 2
> Jan 31 22:31:51 nifty kernel: Call Trace: [schedule_timeout+115/148]
> [process_timeout+0/72] [apm_mainloop+221/256] [apm+668/692]
> [kernel_thread+31/56] [kernel_thread+40/56]
>
> Jan 31 22:31:51 nifty kernel: kswapd S CBF75FAC 5704 4
> 1 (L-TLB) 5 3
> Jan 31 22:31:51 nifty kernel: Call Trace: [schedule_timeout+115/148]
> [process_timeout+0/72] [interruptible_sleep_on_timeout+66/92]
> [kswapd+213/244] [kernel_thread+40/56]
>
> Jan 31 22:31:52 nifty kernel: bdflush S CBF70000 5912 6
> 1 (L-TLB) 7 5
> Jan 31 22:31:52 nifty kernel: Call Trace: [bdflush+206/216]
> [kernel_thread+40/56]
>
>
> In the fourth snapshot, I have put xmms in STOP state again inside the
> memory shortage, memory is at 4800 free buffers/cache and 1592 free mem.
>
> As I entered this shortage period I started a 'ps -eo ... > file' to try
> and record data there. This is the only disk activity happening. Load
> is ~4.00. I have now killed the ps.
>
> Load has dropped significantly and I have tolerable but quite laggy user
> input responsiveness now.
>
> Memory is currently 4900/1588 like above. Load is about 2.00 and will
> continue dropping if I don't do anything. Any processes I exec which
> need to be loaded from disk take several seconds. I.e. 'uptime' takes
> about 4 seconds to execute.
>
> Snapshot #5 will be the last one and I will reboot. Once memory is
> freed from xmms (back to 150megs free), everything is peachy.
>
>
> -d
>
> --
> There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue
and talents.
> Thomas Jefferson The good thing about standards is that there are so many
to choose
> from. Andrew S. Tanenbaum
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
