* Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >                     printk(KERN_ERR "%d multicall(s) failed: cpu %d\n",
> >                            ret, smp_processor_id());
> > -                   for(i = 0; i < b->mcidx; i++) {
> > +                   for (i = 0; i < b->mcidx; i++) {
> >                             printk("  call %2d/%d: op=%lu arg=[%lx] 
> > result=%ld\n",
> 
> The printk needs a KERN_ERR prefix

yes - but we prefer to isolate the "does not change the .o in any way" 
cleanups from cleanups that materially change kernel behavior. (such as 
printing something else)

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to