On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If so, could we avoid that problem by using 0 rather than -1 as the > > "unlimited" value? It looks from what I've read in the Documentation > > changes as though 0 isn't really a meaningful value. > > 0 means no time, quite useful and clearly distinct from inf. time. >
So a real-time task in a cgroup with a 0 rt_runtime can be in the R state but never actually get to run? OK, if people need to be able to do that then fair enough. In that case I guess I'll have to add signed versions of the read_uint/write_uint methods. Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
