On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:01:55 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:50:35 +0000 David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > The kernel NTP code shouldn't hand 64-bit *signed* values to do_div(). > > > Make it > > > instead hand 64-bit unsigned values. This gets rid of a couple of > > > warnings. > > > > On certain architectures. It would have bene nice to mention what those > > architectures are, and to quote the warnings. Next time, please ;) > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --- > > > > > > kernel/time/ntp.c | 12 +++++++----- > > > > Thomas, do you consider ntp to fall under git-hrt? > > I'll pick it up. > OK. And this is still git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/linux-2.6-hrt.git#mm, yes? Can we please define the scope of that tree? Please review fix-shadowed-variables-in-kernel-posix-cpu-timersc.patch timers-simplify-lockdep-stuff.patch hrtimers-simplify-lockdep-stuff.patch kill-double_spin_lock.patch ntp-make-the-kernel-ntp-code-hand-64-bit-unsigned-values-to-do_div.patch from http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/. I think they're all probably git-hrt material. Can we get that tree into linux-next too please? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
