On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:18:23AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> hmmmmm.  We'll see how it plays out...  on the remove side, the above is 
> exact what happens in gdth_remove_one() without my patch, thus 
> consolidating two cases of the same code into one.  There is a less-strong 
> argument for doing the allocation that way, but it may turn out to be 
> useful anyway once the ISA/EISA API conversion is complete.

EISA ->remove has a different prototype from PCI ->remove from ISA
->remove, so gdth_remove_one will be split up eventually.  Having the
scsi_host_put duplicated in each shouldn't be too much of a problem :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to