On Sunday, 24 of February 2008, Julian Blake Kongslie wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 23:35 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [Please don't drop the CC list from replies.]
>
> Yeah, sorry, I accidentally whacked the wrong reply button.
>
> > On Sunday, 24 of February 2008, Julian Blake Kongslie wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 12:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Can you please check what's at the address platform_suspend_late+0x19?
> > >
> > > 0xc0253ca9 is in platform_suspend_late (drivers/base/platform.c:579).
> > > 574 {
> > > 575 struct platform_driver *drv =
> > > to_platform_driver(dev->driver);
> > > 576 struct platform_device *pdev;
> > > 577 int ret = 0;
> > > 578
> > > 579 pdev = container_of(dev, struct platform_device, dev);
> > > 580 if (dev->driver && drv->suspend_late)
> > > 581 ret = drv->suspend_late(pdev, mesg);
> > > 582
> > > 583 return ret;
> >
> > That's strange, it looks like the container_of() accessing beyond the
> > structure.
> >
> > Is this 100% reproducible?
>
> Yes, it is. I've had this hang on suspend since at least some time in
> early 2.6.24-rc, although because I have to transcribe the oops manually
> I haven't had enough incentive to get it reported until now.
> Unfortunately, I just don't need to suspend very often, so it may have
> been introduced some time before then.
>
> If you don't have any other ideas,
No, I don't.
> I can try to bisect and find the change that introduced it,
That would be great.
> but it'll probably take me a day or two; I have other things I need to use my
> computer for, so it's a bit difficult to do the constant-reboot-and-test
> cycle.
Not a problem at all.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
