Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Gabriel C wrote:
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> Gabriel C wrote:
>>>> Laurent Riffard wrote:
>>>>> Le 16.02.2008 09:25, Andrew Morton a écrit :
>>>>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> I'm getting that in mainline now on one of my older laptops also.
>>> we fixed the cause of the machine you quoted; so I suspect yours is
>>> different..
>>> Can you get me your stacktrace ? Can you try the patch from this thread to
>>> show
>>> what memory the offender tries to access ?
>> Arjan , sorry for the lag.
>>
>> With your patch from http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120336371506283&w=2
>> I don't have a warning anymore.
>>
>
> that is ... odd since it's the same in theory, just with some added printk's
> ;-(
>
hmm but in theory only that part of your patch only should do the same , no ?
if (page_is_ram(pfn)) {
printk(..)
}
I'm going to try that.
Gabriel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
