Hi Marcel
>> --- linux-2.6.23/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c.orig 2008-02-25 >> 17:17:11.000000000 +0900 >> +++ linux-2.6.23/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c 2008-02-25 >> 17:30:23.000000000 +0900 >> @@ -1313,8 +1313,17 @@ >> hci_dev_lock(hdev); >> >> conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr); >> - if (!conn) >> - goto unlock; >> + if (!conn) { >> + if (ev->link_type != ACL_LINK) { >> + __u8 link_type = (ev->link_type == ESCO_LINK) ? SCO_LINK : ESCO_LINK; >> + >> + conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, link_type, &ev->bdaddr); >> + if (conn) >> + conn->type = ev->link_type; >> + } >> + if (!conn) >> + goto unlock; >> + } > > NAK. There is no need to check for ACL_LINK. The sync_complete will > only be called for SCO or eSCO connections. I see. I removed this check line in the patch. Thanks. Louis JANG
Signed-off-by: Louis JANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.23/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c.orig 2008-02-26 12:46:36.000000000 +0900 +++ linux-2.6.23/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c 2008-02-26 12:47:23.000000000 +0900 @@ -1313,8 +1313,15 @@ hci_dev_lock(hdev); conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr); - if (!conn) - goto unlock; + if (!conn) { + __u8 link_type = (ev->link_type == ESCO_LINK) ? SCO_LINK : ESCO_LINK; + + conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, link_type, &ev->bdaddr); + if (conn) + conn->type = ev->link_type; + else + goto unlock; + } if (!ev->status) { conn->handle = __le16_to_cpu(ev->handle);