* Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so that would be the following, work for everyone?
>
> WARNING: mutexes are preferred for single holder semaphores
> #1: FILE: Z95.c:1:
> + DECLARE_MUTEX(&foo);
>
> WARNING: mutexes are preferred for single holder semaphores
> #3: FILE: Z95.c:3:
> + init_MUTEX(&foo);
yeah.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
also i guess init_MUTEX_LOCKED() should emit a "this should be a
completion" warning.
i guess non-DEFINE_SPINLOCK old-style spinlock definition:
spinlock_t lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
should emit a 'use DEFINE_SPINLOCK' warning as well?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
