On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:45 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Starting review in the middle, because this is the part I'm most > familiar with. > > > New addres_space_operations methods are added: > > int swapfile(struct address_space *, int); > > Separate ->swapon() and ->swapoff() methods would be so much cleaner IMO.
I'm ok with that, but its a_ops bloat, do we care about that? I guess since it has limited instances - typically one per filesystem - there is no issue here. > Also is there a reason why 'struct file *' cannot be supplied to these > functions? No real reason here. I guess its cleaner indeed. Thanks. > > +int swap_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) > > +{ > > + struct swap_info_struct *sis = page_swap_info(page); > > + > > + if (sis->flags & SWP_FILE) { > > + const struct address_space_operations *a_ops = > > + sis->swap_file->f_mapping->a_ops; > > + int (*spd)(struct page *) = a_ops->set_page_dirty; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK > > + if (!spd) > > + spd = __set_page_dirty_buffers; > > +#endif > > This ifdef is not really needed. Just require ->set_page_dirty() be > filled in by filesystems which want swapfiles (and others too, in the > longer term, the fallback is just historical crud). Agreed. This is a good motivation to clean up that stuff. > Here's an incremental patch addressing these issues and beautifying > the new code. Thanks, I'll fold it into the patch and update the documentation. I'll put your creds in akpm style. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/