On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:33 PM, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> which is the same. set_cpu_cap() is indeed the cleaner form to do this > >> so your patch is correct as a cleanup. > > set_cpu_cap is right > > == > > set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, &c->x86_capability); ===> is wrong > > should be > > set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, c->x86_capability); > > > > x86_capability is a array ... > > > > For an array, the & is optional and has no effect.
good to know. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
