(2012/07/05 15:28), Wanpeng Li wrote: > From: Wanpeng Li <l...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.li...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com> > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index 3d318f6..63e36e7 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ again: > return; > /* > * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't > - * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold > + * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold > * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until > * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true. > */ > @@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page > *page, unsigned long *flags) > /* > * It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while > * lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup > - * should take move_lock_page_cgroup(). > + * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). > */ > move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags); > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
