On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:29:08AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > While mandating FDT is a massive advance over arm32, if there's a chance > that ACPI-based AArch64 platforms will ship in a similar timeframe to > FDT then I think we should ensure that ACPI and FDT are merged > beforehand - the alternative is that people are going to end up writing > the same hardware driver twice for different firmware implementations. I > don't think anyone benefits from introducing a platform that has > multiple device representations[1]
If you end up having to write two whole drivers that sounds enormously depressing especially for those of us working on devices that aren't architecture specific. We've managed to avoid that thus far with device tree and platform data, would it not be possible to mandate that people use ACPI in a vaugley sane way which can support this too? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
