> I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
> more time to read the patches. Now I think the slab/slot changes in this
> v3 are not needed, and can be ignored.

That may take some kernel cycles. You have a current issue here that needs
to be fixed.

> >     down_write(&slub_lock);
> > -   s = find_mergeable(size, align, flags, name, ctor);
> > +   s = find_mergeable(size, align, flags, n, ctor);
> >     if (s) {
> >             s->refcount++;
> >             /*
>
>               ......
>               up_write(&slub_lock);
>               return s;
>       }
>
> Here, the function returns without name string n be kfreed.

That is intentional since the string n is still referenced by the entry
that sysfs_slab_alias has created.

> But we couldn't kfree n here, because in sysfs_slab_alias(), if
> (slab_state < SYS_FS), the name need to be kept valid until
> slab_sysfs_init() is finished adding the entry into sysfs.

Right that is why it is not freed and that is what fixes the issue you
see.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to