On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote: > Sorry, but the ALI code was written based upon ix86 :-( > Where were you guys during 2.3.X development? We had lots of problems with the few 2.3.x kernels we downloaded; and R&D effort was needed elsewhere. Would it help if a UP1100 was somehow made available for testing/development? -- -- John E. Jasen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems Michal Jaegermann
- Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems John Jasen
- Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file system... Michal Jaegermann
- 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problems summar... John Jasen
- Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE problem... Andre Hedrick
- Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE pr... John Jasen
- Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/IDE pr... John Jasen
- Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipset/ID... Michal Jaegermann
- Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipse... John Jasen
- Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipse... Michal Jaegermann
- Re: 2.4.x/alpha/ALI chipse... John Jasen
- Re: 2.4.1 not fully sane on Alpha - file systems Michal Jaegermann