On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 19:16:24 +0100, Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Rusty - sorry I didn't see your email until now - revised patch
> addressing your comments attached -
> BTW, sorry about the word wrap on the initial posting - should I
> attach a '.patch' file or inline ? Trying both .
The inline one was wrapped.
> +static int thermal_temp_b4_trip(const struct dmi_system_id *d) {
> +
> + printk(KERN_NOTICE "ACPI: %s detected: : "
> + "getting temperature before trip point
> initialisation\n", d->ident);
> + temp_b4_trip = TRUE;
> + return 0;
> +}
TRUE? true is standard with stdbool.h.
The patch itself looks reasonable, but it's not my area: I just spotted
the module_param() abuse :)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
