On 03.07.2012 00:25, Andrew Hunter wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/hash.h b/include/linux/hash.h
> index b80506b..daabc3d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hash.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hash.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,9 @@
>  static inline u64 hash_64(u64 val, unsigned int bits)
>  {
>       u64 hash = val;
> -
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> +     hash *= GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_64;
> +#else
>       /*  Sigh, gcc can't optimise this alone like it does for 32 bits. */

Hmm.  Does this comment make sense here now?

Thanks,

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to