Hi Dave,

2012/07/12 0:30, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 03:25 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> @@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start,
>>      }
>>
>>      /* create new memmap entry */
>> -    firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size, "System RAM");
>> +    firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size - 1, "System RAM");
> 
> I know the firmware_map_*() calls use inclusive end addresses
> internally, but do we really need to expose them?  Both of the callers
> you mentioned do:
> 
>       firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size - 1, "System RAM");
> 
> or
> 
>                  firmware_map_add_early(entry->addr,
>                          entry->addr + entry->size - 1,
>                          e820_type_to_string(entry->type));
> 
> So it seems a _bit_ silly to keep all of the callers doing this size-1
> thing.  I also noted that the new caller that you added does the same
> thing.  Could we just change the external calling convention to be
> exclusive?

Thank you for your comment.

Does the following patch include your comment? If O.K., I will separate
the patch from the series and send it for bug fix.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/e820.c    |    2 +-
 drivers/firmware/memmap.c |    8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-next/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c      2012-07-02 09:50:23.000000000 
+0900
+++ linux-next/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c   2012-07-12 13:30:45.942318179 +0900
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@
        for (i = 0; i < e820_saved.nr_map; i++) {
                struct e820entry *entry = &e820_saved.map[i];
                firmware_map_add_early(entry->addr,
-                       entry->addr + entry->size - 1,
+                       entry->addr + entry->size,
                        e820_type_to_string(entry->type));
        }
 }
Index: linux-next/drivers/firmware/memmap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/drivers/firmware/memmap.c   2012-07-02 09:50:26.000000000 
+0900
+++ linux-next/drivers/firmware/memmap.c        2012-07-12 13:40:53.823318481 
+0900
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
 /**
  * firmware_map_add_entry() - Does the real work to add a firmware memmap 
entry.
  * @start: Start of the memory range.
- * @end:   End of the memory range (inclusive).
+ * @end:   End of the memory range.
  * @type:  Type of the memory range.
  * @entry: Pre-allocated (either kmalloc() or bootmem allocator), uninitialised
  *         entry.
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
        BUG_ON(start > end);

        entry->start = start;
-       entry->end = end;
+       entry->end = end - 1;
        entry->type = type;
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list);
        kobject_init(&entry->kobj, &memmap_ktype);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
  * firmware_map_add_hotplug() - Adds a firmware mapping entry when we do
  * memory hotplug.
  * @start: Start of the memory range.
- * @end:   End of the memory range (inclusive).
+ * @end:   End of the memory range.
  * @type:  Type of the memory range.
  *
  * Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function is for memory hotplug, it is
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
 /**
  * firmware_map_add_early() - Adds a firmware mapping entry.
  * @start: Start of the memory range.
- * @end:   End of the memory range (inclusive).
+ * @end:   End of the memory range.
  * @type:  Type of the memory range.
  *
  * Adds a firmware mapping entry. This function uses the bootmem allocator

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to