From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcg...@do-not-panic.com> My last series of patches require a rebase based on the latest changes, so patches 1-4 are a simple rebase. Patch 5 and 6 address removing the anti-tivoization clause, section 7. This will at the very least clarify whether or not copyleft-next can or cannot be considered as a licensing project with hopes of using it for the Linux kernel.
Given copyleft-next's focus on separating from the Church and in my views any possible 'corporate taint', I'm in hopes that copyleft-next *can* consider the Linux kernel community as a possible future and valuable stakeholder. Luis R. Rodriguez (6): copyleft-next: remove issue tracker references copyleft-next: more project name updates Copyleft.next->copyleft-next copyleft-next: rename the file COPYLEFT.next to copyleft-next copyleft-next: embrace the Signed-off-by practice copyleft-next: remove section 7 - Tivoization copyleft-next: re-enumerate sections ABOUT | 10 ++--- CONTRIBUTING | 45 ++++++++++++++------ COPYLEFT.next => copyleft-next | 90 ++++++++++------------------------------ 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) rename COPYLEFT.next => copyleft-next (82%) -- 1.7.10.rc1.22.gf5241 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
