Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, tmpfs appears to cover the functionality provided by ramfs.
> Are there any uses for ramfs which can't be handled by tmpfs?
Nothing I know of.
> The only thing I could think of was "what if you don't have a
> swap device up and running". Seems it doesn't need one :))
Yes and no. tmpfs has a little bit overhead for the noswap case but
this overhead is in the kernel anyways for shared anon mappings. The
whole vm is using swap unconditionally.
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
