On Mo, 16.07.2012, 15:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 09:56 +0200, Piotr Sawuk wrote:
>> On Sa, 14.07.2012, 03:31, [email protected] wrote:
>> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:55:44 -0700, Stephen Hemminger said:
>> >
>> >> >+                        /* Course retransmit inefficiency- this packet 
>> >> >has been received
>> >> twice. */
>> >> >+                        tp->dup_pkts_recv++;
>> >> I don't understand that comment, could you use a better sentence
>> please?
>> >
>> > I think what was intended was:
>> >
>> > /* Curse you, retransmit inefficiency! This packet has been received at
>> least twice */
>> >
>>
>> LOL, no. I think "course retransmit" is short for "course-grained timeout
>> caused retransmit" but I can't be sure since I'm not the author of these
>> lines. I'll replace that comment with the non-shorthand version though.
>> however, I think the real comment here should be:
> [...]
>
> The word you are looking for is 'coarse' not 'course' (they are
> generally pronounced the same, to confuse you).

that was my first thought too.
but then I noticed the word "course" in the kernel's comments.
judging by context it describes the events of a round-trip.
so I guess Course-Grained means RTT-grained.
especially since this misspelling was consistent in the author's paper.

anyway, new patch, made some mistakes in my previous version.
also I added the jiffies_to_msecs noone dared to mention
comments and suggestions as always welcome:

diff -rub A/include/linux/tcp.h B/include/linux/tcp.h
--- A/include/linux/tcp.h       2012-07-08 02:23:56.000000000 +0200
+++ B/include/linux/tcp.h       2012-07-16 16:42:08.000000000 +0200
@@ -492,6 +492,17 @@
         * contains related tcp_cookie_transactions fields.
         */
        struct tcp_cookie_values  *cookie_values;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+       /*
+        * TCP health monitoring counters.
+        */
+       __u32   dup_acks_sent;
+       __u32   dup_pkts_recv;
+       __u32   acks_sent;
+       __u32   pkts_recv;
+       __u32   last_ack_sent;  /* Sequence number of the last ack we sent. */
+#endif
 };

 static inline struct tcp_sock *tcp_sk(const struct sock *sk)
diff -rub A/net/ipv4/Kconfig B/net/ipv4/Kconfig
--- A/net/ipv4/Kconfig  2012-07-08 02:23:56.000000000 +0200
+++ B/net/ipv4/Kconfig  2012-07-16 11:56:15.000000000 +0200
@@ -619,6 +619,28 @@
        default "reno" if DEFAULT_RENO
        default "cubic"

+config TCPHEALTH
+       bool "TCP client-side health-statistics (/proc/net/tcphealth)"
+       default n
+       ---help---
+       TCP Health Monitoring (established connections only):
+        -Duplicate ACKs indicate there could be lost or reordered packets
+         on the connection.
+        -Duplicate Packets Received signal a slow and badly inefficient
+         connection.
+        -RttEst estimates how long future packets will take on a round trip
+         over the connection.
+
+       Additionally you get total amount of sent ACKs and received Packets.
+       All these values are displayed seperately for each connection.
+       If you are running a dedicated server you wont need this.
+       Duplicate ACKs refers only to those sent upon receiving a Packet.
+       A server most likely doesn't receive much Packets to count.
+       Hence for a server these statistics wont be meaningful.
+       especially since they are split into individual connections.
+
+       If you plan to investigate why some download is slow, say Y.
+
 config TCP_MD5SIG
        bool "TCP: MD5 Signature Option support (RFC2385) (EXPERIMENTAL)"
        depends on EXPERIMENTAL
diff -rub A/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c B/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
--- A/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c      2012-07-08 02:23:56.000000000 +0200
+++ B/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c      2012-07-16 16:45:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -4492,6 +4492,11 @@
                }

                if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+                       /* Course-Grained Timeout caused retransmit 
inefficiency-
+                        * this packet has been received twice. */
+                       tp->dup_pkts_recv++;
+#endif
                        SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "ofo packet was already received\n");
                        __skb_unlink(skb, &tp->out_of_order_queue);
                        __kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -4824,6 +4829,12 @@
                return;
        }

+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+       /* A packet is a "duplicate" if it contains bytes we have already
received. */
+       if (before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt))
+               tp->dup_pkts_recv++;
+#endif
+
        if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
                /* A retransmit, 2nd most common case.  Force an immediate ack. 
*/
                NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_DELAYEDACKLOST);
@@ -5535,6 +5546,12 @@

        tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;

+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+       /*
+        *      total per-connection packet arrivals.
+        */
+       tp->pkts_recv++;
+#endif
        /*      pred_flags is 0xS?10 << 16 + snd_wnd
         *      if header_prediction is to be made
         *      'S' will always be tp->tcp_header_len >> 2
diff -rub A/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c B/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
--- A/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c       2012-07-08 02:23:56.000000000 +0200
+++ B/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c       2012-07-16 16:29:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -2500,6 +2500,57 @@
        return 0;
 }

+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+/*
+ *     Output /proc/net/tcphealth
+ */
+#define LINESZ 128
+
+int tcp_health_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+       int len;
+       struct tcp_iter_state *st;
+
+       if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
+               seq_printf(seq,
+               "id   Local Address        Remote Address       RttEst(ms) 
AcksSent "
+               "DupAcksSent PktsRecv DupPktsRecv\n");
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       /* Loop through established TCP connections */
+       st = seq->private;
+
+
+       if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED)
+       {
+               const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(v);
+               const struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(v);
+
+               seq_printf(seq, "%d: %-21pI4:%u %-21pI4:%u "
+                               "%8u %8lu %8lu %8lu %8lu%n",
+                               st->num,
+                               &inet->inet_rcv_saddr,
+                               ntohs(inet->inet_sport),
+                               &inet->inet_daddr,
+                               ntohs(inet->inet_dport),
+                               jiffies_to_msecs(tp->srtt),
+                               tp->acks_sent,
+                               tp->dup_acks_sent,
+                               tp->pkts_recv,
+                               tp->dup_pkts_recv,
+
+                               &len
+                       );
+
+               seq_printf(seq, "%*s\n", LINESZ - 1 - len, "");
+       }
+
+out:
+       return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_TCPHEALTH */
+
 static const struct file_operations tcp_afinfo_seq_fops = {
        .owner   = THIS_MODULE,
        .open    = tcp_seq_open,
@@ -2508,6 +2559,17 @@
        .release = seq_release_net
 };

+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+static struct tcp_seq_afinfo tcphealth_seq_afinfo = {
+       .name           = "tcphealth",
+       .family         = AF_INET,
+       .seq_fops       = &tcp_afinfo_seq_fops,
+       .seq_ops        = {
+               .show           = tcp_health_seq_show,
+       },
+};
+#endif
+
 static struct tcp_seq_afinfo tcp4_seq_afinfo = {
        .name           = "tcp",
        .family         = AF_INET,
@@ -2519,12 +2581,20 @@

 static int __net_init tcp4_proc_init_net(struct net *net)
 {
-       return tcp_proc_register(net, &tcp4_seq_afinfo);
+       int ret = tcp_proc_register(net, &tcp4_seq_afinfo);
+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+       if(ret == 0)
+               ret = tcp_proc_register(net, &tcphealth_seq_afinfo);
+#endif
+       return ret;
 }

 static void __net_exit tcp4_proc_exit_net(struct net *net)
 {
        tcp_proc_unregister(net, &tcp4_seq_afinfo);
+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+       tcp_proc_unregister(net, &tcphealth_seq_afinfo);
+#endif
 }

 static struct pernet_operations tcp4_net_ops = {
diff -rub A/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c B/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
--- A/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c     2012-07-08 02:23:56.000000000 +0200
+++ B/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c     2012-07-16 09:44:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -2772,8 +2772,19 @@
        skb_reserve(buff, MAX_TCP_HEADER);
        tcp_init_nondata_skb(buff, tcp_acceptable_seq(sk), TCPHDR_ACK);

+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+       /* If the rcv_nxt has not advanced since sending our last ACK, this is a
duplicate. */
+       if (tcp_sk(sk)->rcv_nxt == tcp_sk(sk)->last_ack_sent)
+               tcp_sk(sk)->dup_acks_sent++;
+       /* Record the total number of acks sent on this connection. */
+       tcp_sk(sk)->acks_sent++;
+#endif
+
        /* Send it off, this clears delayed acks for us. */
        TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->when = tcp_time_stamp;
+#ifdef CONFIG_TCPHEALTH
+       tcp_sk(sk)->last_ack_sent = tcp_sk(sk)->rcv_nxt;
+#endif
        tcp_transmit_skb(sk, buff, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to